Quantcast
Channel: Military
Viewing all 10474 articles
Browse latest View live

A Naval engineer with access to US secrets indicted over Iranian passports and false identities

$
0
0

US Navy naval surface warfare center

James Robert Baker, a naturalized US citizen from Tehran, Iran, who worked as a civilian engineer for the US Navy for 30 years has been indicted on charges of lying about his dual Iranian citizenship and creating false identities to conceal money he received from overseas, but experts say he won't face more than 5 years in prison, according to the Navy Times.

Baker, who was born Majid Karimi, naturalized and changed his name in 1985 and began working at the Naval Surface Warfare Center before moving to NAVSEA in 2006.

During this time he received security clearances and had access to classified information.

The federal government indicted Baker on or around February 4, on 14 counts on charges including lying on his SF-86 security clearance questionnaire, committing identification documents fraud, and social security fraud.

According to the indictment, the Navy told Baker a few days after the September 11, 2001 attacks that he could not maintain his security clearance while holding an Iranian Passport, and that he would need to prove that he had given up the passport before his security clearance could be reinstated.

Six days later, Baker flew to Iran. A month later, the Navy learned of Baker's trip to Iran and suspended his clearance. Baker challenged the suspension, saying he had returned the passport to Iran, and had is clearance reinstated in 2002.

However, In July of this year, authorities searched Baker’s home in Springfield, Virginia., and discovered a Maryland driver’s license under the name Majid Karimi, and the key to a safe-deposit box located at a bank in nearby Vienna, Virginia.

Iranian Biometric Passport CoverWhen the agents went to search the safe-deposit box in Vienna, Baker reportedly stormed in demanding access to his safe-deposit box, which was refused to him as agents carried out the warrant.

Once opened, agents found three Iranian passports under the name Majid Karimi with Baker's picture on them, including the one he claimed to have given up.

Agents also discovered four social security cards and five drivers licenses under his various aliases with addresses in different states.

The alternate identities are especially intriguing as prosecutors allege that Baker received large amounts of money from overseas accounts, and spread them across his different identities.

The implications of a civilian working in the Navy with a high security clearance are troubling, but the fact that the indictment was public indicates that the prosecution is unlikely to bring espionage charges against Baker.

“It’s probably frustrating for the prosecutor,” Bill Cowden, a former prosecutor who is now a defense attorney with the Federal Practice Group in Washington, D.C. told the Navy times.

“They probably think there’s something more going on here, he’s got money coming in from overseas and probably don’t know what the source of it is and haven’t been able to get as far into it as they’d like. Or they’ve run it to ground and they think he’s a social security and tax fraud,” Cowden continued.

naval engineerThe breach of security profiles caused by Baker's deception echoes similar cases of indiscretion like Hillary Clinton's use of a private server to store her emails during her time as Secretary of State. 

“He shouldn’t have a security clearance, no questions about it,” Cowden said of Baker to the Navy Times.

“This is just another example of what’s causing a lot of people to question whose dropping the ball on security clearances. You have leaks of government information, you have people accessing personnel records and you have this. It just doesn’t give you a lot of confidence that the government is doing a good job of vetting people.”

Baker has been suspended from his job at NAVSEA pending the results of the prosecution. 

SEE ALSO: 'A constant drip, drip, drip': A judge just made clear that Hillary's email problems aren't going away anytime soon

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: ‘How can you be this bad at it?’: Colbert joked about Clinton’s trusthworthiness — here’s how she responded


Meet the Canadian Army’s new ‘live’ mascot

$
0
0

juno canadian army

A five month old, 20 some odd pound polar bear cub took the name of Juno, and was named as the new living mascot of the Canadian Army on Thursday, according to CBC News.

The bear, born on November 11, 2015, or Remembrance Day, Canada's version of Memorial day, was named Juno after the hundreds of Canadian soldiers who were killed or wounded during the 1944 allied storming of Juno beach on D-Day.

"We are proud and happy to adopt Juno to the army today, and to promote her immediately to the rank of private," said Brigadier General David Patterson of the bear.

"Polar bears are brave, strong, resilient, tenacious, agile and more than capable of defending themselves, just like our Canadian soldiers," said Patterson.

Juno will live with his mother at the Toronto zoo, and will join her in the exhibit starting on February 27. 

Watch video of the Toronto zoo and Canadian Army's announcement below:

SEE ALSO: The brutal, ridiculous way giraffes fight

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is exactly what you should do if a bear attacks you

The world in photos this week

$
0
0

A selection of photos from some of this week's biggest news that you might have missed.

SEE ALSO: 21 stunning photos prove the US Navy and US Marine Corps have the best diving boards and swimming pools

Rebel fighters inspect a piece of a rocket that landed in an area that connects the northern countryside of Deraa and the Quneitra countryside in southern Syria on February 22.



Syria Democratic Forces fighters look through a scope and a pair of binoculars on the outskirts of al-Shadadi town, in Syria's Hasaka countryside.



Macedonian policemen stand in front of a gate over rail tracks as migrants wait behind at the Greek-Macedonian border. Additional passage restriction imposed by Macedonian authorities left hundreds of them stranded near the village of Idomeni, Greece, on February 23.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

A Canadian sailor made history with a single kiss

$
0
0

In the Canadian Navy, "first kiss" is a tradition in which one sailor is picked at random to disembark first and kiss his significant other. This year, they broke new ground with the first ever "first kiss" between a same-sex couple.

Story by Ian Phillips and editing by Stephen Parkhurst

Follow INSIDER on Facebook
Follow INSIDERon YouTube

Join the conversation about this story »

Marine veteran confronts Bill Clinton at event in South Carolina

$
0
0

Bill Clinton

A protester who identified himself as a former Marine confronted former US president Bill Clinton at a rally in South Carolina on Friday.

The exchange began as Clinton spoke in support of his wife Hillary Clinton's current run for the White House.

The protester, who according to American Military News was a US Marine veteran who served two tours of duty in Iraq, began talking to Bill Clinton about the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

The former commander in chief responded by asking, "What should we do about the VA?"

But the former Marine quickly pivoted into a speech about the 2012 terror attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans and seven Libyans.

“The thing is, we had four lives in Benghazi killed and your wife tried to cover it up,” the protester yelled. Attendees at the event started booing and security guards moved in to escort the man out of the rally.

Clinton urged the guards to let the veteran stay as Clinton tried to reason with the man.

“Am I allowed to answer? I’m not your commander in chief anymore, but if I were, I’d tell you to be more polite and sit down.”

“I wouldn’t listen!” the man shouted back.

You can watch the full exchange here:

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Sanders predicts he'll win the democratic nomination in one of the great 'political upsets in the history of the US'

A Navy SEAL's advice on how to choose the best workout

The UN plans to get direly needed aid to 154,000 besieged Syrians in the next 5 days

$
0
0

A toddler is held up to the camera in this still image taken from video said to be shot in Madaya on January 5, 2016. Handout via Social Media Website

The United Nations and partner aid organizations plan to deliver life-saving aid to 154,000 Syrians in besieged areas in the next five days, the U.N. Resident Coordinator in Damascus Yacoub El Hillo said in a statement on Sunday.

Pending approval from parties to the conflict, the U.N. is ready to deliver aid to about 1.7 million people in hard-to-reach areas in the first quarter of 2016, he said.

The U.N. estimates there are almost 500,000 people living under siege, out of a total 4.6 million who are hard to reach with aid, but it hopes that a cessation of hostilities that began on Friday night will bring an end to the 15 sieges.

"It is the best opportunity that the Syrian people have had over the last five years for lasting peace and stability," El Hillo said.

"But we all know that without a meaningful political process and a political solution, both cessation of hostilities and entry of humanitarian assistance will not be enough to end the crisis in Syria."

The U.N. hopes to deliver aid to Moadamiya on Monday, the "four towns" of Zabadani, Kufreya, Foua and Madaya on Wednesday, and Kafr Batna on Friday.

But the biggest single siege, of about 200,000 people in Deir al-Zor, is not affected by the cessation of hostilities because the besieging Islamic State forces are excluded from the agreement.

The U.N. attempted an air drop there last week but high winds meant all 21 tonnes of food went off target or went missing or their parachutes failed to open and they were destroyed.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Ashton Kutcher just made a surprise appearance on Ian Bremmer's weekly digital video series

As tensions rise with China, the US and India discuss sharing military logistics

$
0
0

An officer (R) of Indian Air Force (IAF) Special Forces

By Sanjeev Miglani and David Brunnstrom

NEW DELHI/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - India and the United States are closing in on an agreement to share military logistics after 12 years of talks, officials said, a sign of strengthening defense ties between the countries as China becomes increasingly assertive.

The United States has emerged as India's top arms source after years of dominance by Russia, and holds more joint exercises with it than any other country.

It is in talks with New Delhi to help build its largest aircraft carrier in the biggest military collaboration to date, a move that will bolster the Indian navy's strength as China expands its reach in the Indian Ocean.

After years of foot-dragging by previous governments over fears that the logistics agreement would draw India into a binding commitment to support the United States in war, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration has signaled a desire to move ahead with the Logistics Support Agreement (LSA).

That would allow the two militaries to use each other's land, air and naval bases for resupplies, repair and rest, officials said.

Admiral Harry Harris, head of the U.S. Navy's Pacific Command, said the two sides were working on the LSA, another agreement called the CISMOA for secure communications when the militaries operate together, and a third on exchange of topographical, nautical, and aeronautical data.

"We have not gotten to the point of signing them with India, but I think we're close," Harris, due in India this week, told the U.S. House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday.

vikramditya aircraft carrier india

The progress comes as the countries consider joint maritime patrols that a U.S. official said could include the South China Sea, where China is locked in a territorial dispute with Vietnam, the Philippines and Taiwan among others.

Both sides, though, said there were no immediate plans for such patrols, which drew strong condemnation from Beijing.

An Indian government official said the main impediment to signing the LSA had been cleared, after Washington gave an assurance that New Delhi was not bound by it if the U.S. went to war with a friendly country or undertook any other unilateral action that New Delhi did not support.

"It has been clarified that it will be done on a case-to-case basis; it's not automatic that either side will get access to facilities in the case of war," the official familiar with the negotiations said.

India's previous center-left government was worried the agreements would undermine India's strategic autonomy and that it would draw it into an undeclared military alliance with the United States.

india

Concerns linger over the proposed communications agreement, with some branches of the military including the air force fearing it would allow the United States to access their communications network.

U.S. officials said they hoped that once the logistics agreement was signed, the others would follow.

A U.S. defense industry source engaged in business in India said there were expectations the LSA could be sealed by the time U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter visited New Delhi in April.

The source said Modi's office was directly involved in the matter and actively considering the agreements as a key for enhanced cooperation.

India has been alarmed by Chinese naval forays into the Indian Ocean and its involvement in maritime infrastructure on island nations that it traditionally considered its back yard.

It has moved to shore up naval forces and build defense ties with Japan and Vietnam, besides the United States.

"There is growing convergence between Obama's Asia pivot and Modi's Act East policy," said Saroj Bishoyi, an expert on the proposed India-U.S. collaboration at the government-funded Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses in New Delhi.

"The LSA currently appears to be a doable agreement."

SEE ALSO: China may be installing advanced radars on disputed South China Sea outposts

Join the conversation about this story »


Why Saudi Arabia is losing patience with Lebanon

$
0
0

hezbollah lebanonLebanon is inching closer toward becoming a failing state. Services are mediocre, the infrastructure crumbling, garbage piling up and the economy contracting. Now Beirut has added yet another failure to its list: Amateurish diplomacy that is turning whoever is left of Lebanon's friends into enemies. Lebanon’s deteriorating relationship with Saudi Arabia is a case in point.

But before we understand the reasons behind Beirut’s crumbling relations with Riyadh, a quick history is in order.

During the civil war, the Lebanese state managed to maintain some neutrality and decency. In the thick of war, Beirut deployed skilled Foreign Ministers like Fouad Boutros and savvy diplomats like Ghassan Tueni.

But when the war ended in 1991, warlords and their militias took over the state and infested its bureaucracy. Suddenly, the nation’s foreign ministry turned from the voice of a weak, yet credible, government into one of the spoils rewarded to Lebanon’s new and incompetent leaders.

During the 1990s, late Prime Minister Rafik Hariri — a leader with unparalleled skills — covered up for the failure of Lebanese diplomacy. During all-out wars with Israel, like in 1996, Hariri shuttled between foreign capitals and invaded international broadcasts making the case for Lebanon.

At the Arab Summit in Beirut in 2002, when Syrian President Bashar al-Assad instructed his Lebanese counterpart Emile Lahoud to censor late Palestinian President Yasser Arafat’s live video address from his siege in Ramallah, it was Hariri who roamed the corridors at Phoenicia Hotel and brought back the Palestinian delegation, thus saving face for Beirut and its summit.

But after Hariri, the inadequacy of Lebanon’s Foreign Ministry became evident, especially after the takeover by Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil, an engineer by training. Those who think career diplomats can make up for Bassil’s inexperience, keep in mind that — like in the rest of the Lebanese bureaucracy — sectarian quota and appointment by political intercession trumps qualification.

Gebran Bassil lebanon

Bassil’s shortcomings at Lebanon’s Foreign Ministry — like in his role at the Ministery of Electricity — have been evident for a long time. Bassil abused state resources by treating himself to a summer trip to Brazil to watch the 2014 World Cup games, justifying his trip by saying that its goal was to connect with the Lebanese Diaspora (even though emigrants usually visit Lebanon in the summer).

The Lebanese also watched another one of Bassil’s scandals, on video, when he looked as if he was offering the sexual services of one of Lebanon’s senior female diplomats in New York to the Foreign Minister of the UAE.

Bassil’s blunders at the Foreign Ministry and his amateurism eventually caught up with him at the Arab League’s meeting that was convened, in January, to condemn Iranian attacks on the Saudi embassy in Tehran and its consulate in Meshhad.

Had Bassil had the slightest of diplomatic wit, he would have noticed that Iran’s three most ardent Arab allies — Iraq, Oman and Algeria — voted for the resolution. Algeria, which noted its reservation on commending the Saudi severing of ties with Iran, still voted for the resolution. Bassil did not.

Even Iranian President Hassan Rouhani denounced the attacks and said that his government had opened an investigation to punish the perpetrators.

Iran's President Hassan Rouhani speaks during a joint news conference at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, January 28, 2016.  REUTERS/Charles Platiau

So here you have it: Lebanon’s talentless Foreign Minister Bassil, who won his position thanks to his familial connections, has taken down the last shred of respectability that the Lebanese state once enjoyed.

Perhaps Bassil thought that Arab League meeting was one of Lebanon’s irrelevant cabinet meetings. Perhaps he thought he could erase his mistake by having his and Hezbollah’s media tweaking the story, just like they did with the UN Tribunal, among other false propaganda stunts.

Unfortunately, the only thing worse than Bassil’s blunder at the Arab League was the Lebanese failure to understand the mistake and rectify it.

Lebanon’s enemies of Saudi Arabia started questioning its angry position. Lebanon’s friends of Saudi Arabia launched a campaign against Iran and Hezbollah.

A better response might be to review the bylaws of the Arab League and see whether Beirut can recast Lebanon’s vote. Symbolic as it may be, recasting the vote might tell Riyadh that Beirut understands that Lebanese-Saudi relations cannot be run by amateurs like Bassil, for if Saudi Arabia believes that the Lebanese government is in the image of Bassil, the kingdom will certainly continue distancing itself away from Lebanon, for the first time since the inception of both countries.

Recasting Lebanon’s vote at the Arab League might help rekindle the crumbling Lebanese-Saudi friendship, which if it ever collapses, will cost the Lebanese dearly.

Hussain Abdul-Hussain is the Washington Bureau Chief of Kuwaiti newspaper Alrai. He tweet @hahussain.

SEE ALSO: Iranian reformists set to win all Tehran parliamentary seats

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: IAN BREMMER: Ukraine's government will fall apart 'by the end of this year'

FORMER CIA DIRECTOR: The US military is legally obligated to refuse Trump’s proposed military action

Blocking US foreign military sales is a total mistake

$
0
0

USAF_F 16A_F 15C_F 15E_Desert_Storm_edit2

As still the world’s sole superpower, the United States possesses an unequaled array of instruments to support its foreign and defense strategies. 

With so much attention being focused on the conflicts in the Middle East, Russian aggression in Eastern Europe and Chinese efforts to assert its hegemony in the Western Pacific, the fact that the United States employs a wide range of non-military, or at least non-kinetic tools in pursuing its national interests is lost.

Most recently, for example, the United States and China agreed on the imposition of new trade sanctions on North Korea in response to that country’s test of a long-range ballistic missile.

One of the most important of these tools is foreign military sales (FMS). The complex role of FMS is reflected, in part, in the fact that the program is run by the Department of State and not the Department of Defense.

One reason for this unusual management approach is that the FMS program involves sales by the US government of US arms, defense equipment, defense services, and military training to foreign governments.

As a result, such sales reflect the views of the US government with respect to the recipient country, its relationships with others in the region and the overall approach this country takes to mitigating the threat of regional or global conflict.

The FMS program serves many other purposes. The sales of US arms and related items to foreign countries helps reduce the cost of those systems to our own military. FMS sales help to ensure the ability of US allies to defend themselves and support the maintenance of stable regional military balances.

patriot missile

Equally important, FMS sales over time establish enduring relationships between foreign governments and their militaries and the US When the US military trains alongside those of allies equipped with the same hardware, it helps to cement the bonds between our countries.

Moreover, it improves communications and understanding among these militaries, often helping to inculcate US values related to the use of military force. Foreign militaries dependent on access to US hardware, spare parts, software upgrades and training are more likely to listen to this country when there is a dispute regarding regional politics or defense issues.

FMS has been particularly important as an instrument for influencing foreign governments and shaping regional balances of power in the Middle East. Following the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, the United States completely reequipped the Egyptian military.

egypt

The Egyptian-Israeli border has been remarkably stable ever since. Sales of military aircraft, missile defense systems and precision munitions to the nations of the Persian Gulf have been instrumental in ensuring a stable balance of forces in that area.

Pakistan has been a recipient of US arms. FMS sales have been extremely important to US efforts to ensure Pakistan’s reliability as an ally in the war on terror. Congress has appropriated about $3.6 billion in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) for Pakistan since 2001. The kind of equipment provided ranges from radios, transport aircraft and unmanned systems to F-16 fighters.

Recently, the State Department approved the sale of eight F-16s to Pakistan. Pakistan intends to use these aircraft in its fight against domestic terrorists. The US and other regional allies have found the F-16 to be an effective platform for conducting precision strikes against terrorist targets. In addition, India is pursuing a major Air Force modernization program. The sale of F-16s to Pakistan would help to maintain the balance of power in the subcontinent.

Aggressors F 16

Unfortunately, Senator Rand Paul has filed a Joint Resolution of Disapproval for this sale, something that hasn’t happened since the 1980s. The effort to block this sale is a mistake. It will serve only to weaken the relationship between our two countries even as the fight against the Taliban continues and intensifies in Afghanistan.

In addition, it leaves the way open for Pakistan to acquire aircraft from other suppliers, such as China or Russia. The only practical effect that disapproval of this sale will have is to weaken Washington’s hand at a time when it needs all the policy instruments it can muster.

SEE ALSO: Watch the US-led coalition's precision airstrikes shred ISIS positions in Syria

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: FORMER CIA DIRECTOR: The US military is legally obligated to refuse Trump’s proposed military action

ISIS is ramping up new ways to raise funds

$
0
0

ISIS Islamic State Fighter Flag Mosul

Despite bombings and financial sanctions the Islamic State is still coming up with ways to bring in cash. The Wall Street Journal and Financial Times just documented IS’s deals with Iraqi money exchangers and Syrian oil traders to keep money flowing into the caliphate.

It’s yet to be seen whether that’s enough to sustain itself, but it shows that it will still take a lot more to cut off the group’s sources of funding.

Erika Solomon from the Financial Times reported on how the Islamic State is offering bulk oil deals in an attempt to avoid coalition air strikes. IS is issuing 1,000 barrel petroleum licenses to oil traders in Syria. A Syrian trucker said that three businesses had been given these offerings that involve the al-Omar field.

This was in direct response to coalition air strikes that have been hitting tanker trucks at oil fields and IS’s storage facilities. By making these large deals IS can be assured of sales and arrange times and places for deliveries to avoid a large number of trucks cuing up at the Omar field, which might invite an air strike.

It also keeps their oil flowing to local markets in Syria and Iraq, which the group has come to rely upon. For the traders they can buy a large quantity of oil from IS instead of waiting for small purchases with everyone else.

The Wall Street Journal added another piece on money exchangers who continue to operate in IS controlled territory. These businesses play a crucial role in sustaining the caliphate as they deliver cash. At the center of this network is allegedly Abu Omar, a Mosul based businessman who also operates in Irbil, Sulaymaniya and Hit. After Mosul was taken in June 2014 he agreed to handle the organization’s money affairs.

He and other exchanges reportedly bring in cash into the caliphate through three main routes. One is from Istanbul through Kurdistan to Mosul. Another is from Amman to Anbar and Baghdad, and the third is from Turkey’s Gaziantep to Raqqa, Syria. Allegedly Peshmerga and Hashd accept bribes to allow these businesses to delivery cash into IS areas. At the end of 2014, the U.S. warned the Central Bank of Iraq about these companies and how they were buying U.S. dollars at the Bank’s auctions to support IS.

Kurds Kurdish Peshmerga Fighters Mosul Iraq

The Central Bank responded by handing out fines to banks and then banned 142 money exchangers in December 2014 from the auctions. The problem was that Iraq has no real regulators so all these businesses had to do was set up a front company and they could get right back into buying dollars. Baghdad cannot crackdown on the money exchanges or auctions for two main reasons.

First, many of Iraq’s traders rely upon exchanges rather than banks to provide cash for their transactions, so they can’t be shut down without crippling the economy. Second, Iran, Syria, Iraqi organized crime rings, and the nation’s ruling parties are all involved in buying dollars from the Central Bank to either gain access to hard currency or to sell on the open market for a profit.

That is a powerful group of actors, which banking officials do not want to confront. That means there will be no real reform of the auctions or effective measures taken against the exchanges to limit the Islamic State’s access to dollars and cash.

One of the defining features of the Islamic State is its resilience. Faced with powerful enemies the group is still working on counter moves. It is attempting to create new oil contracts to deal with air strikes. It has also continued to bring in cash through money exchangers, which keeps its economy going.

Western reports have IS struggling. It has allegedly cut the salaries of its fighters, imposed fuel rationing, and is facing rising prices. As one of its key phrases says however, the group is enduring these setbacks and attempting to find ways to overcome them. They highlight the fact that the caliphate is being hurt, but there is still a long way to go before it is defeated.

SEE ALSO: Watch coalition airstrikes obliterate 2 ISIS financial-storage centers holding hundreds of millions of dollars

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Ashton Kutcher just made a surprise appearance on Ian Bremmer's weekly digital video series

Watch a US-made missile take out Russia's most advanced tanks

$
0
0

tow anti tank missile free syrian army t-90

In a video posted to YouTube Friday, Syrian rebels appear to have filmed themselves firing for the first time a US-made TOW anti-tank missile at a Russian T-90 tank.

According to the video's caption, the TOW strike occurred in the Syrian town of Sheikh Aqil, a suburb just northwest of Aleppo.

The BGM-71 TOW is an aging wire-guided anti-tank missile system that the United States has been supplying to CIA-vetted Syrian rebels.

Since their first appearance in 2014, the missiles have popped up throughout the war-torn country, often in videos showing rebels attacking Syrian troops and government-backed militias.

Friday's video is significant because there is very little footage, if any, of a US TOW going up against one of Russia's most modern battle tanks. In this case, it is unclear if the T-90 in the video was crewed by Russian or Syrian troops.

When Russia first began pumping equipment and personnel into northern Syria in September 2015, there were confirmed reports of the T-90s at Russia's airfield in Latakia, though they were likely only there to defend the airfield.

Russia has supplied various other types of tanks to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's military. However, the arrival of the T-90s in September was the first shipment of its kind in the almost five year-old war.

In November 2015, the tanks appeared well to the east of Latakia, near Aleppo. Around the same time, a report from Al-Masdar Al-'Arabi news indicated that a small detachment of T-90s was given to a Syrian Army mechanized unit to help with current offensive operations in the region. In recent weeks, the advanced battle tanks were filmed during a CNN segment on the outskirts of Raqqa.

In the video, the missile appears to strike the turret of the tank. As mentioned on other blogs, the T-90 appears to be equipped with a Shtora—a device designed to disrupt incoming wired-guided and infrared guided missiles, much like the TOW. In this case, it appears the system failed or wasn't active. Though the video shows the tank's crew member bailing out, it looks like the strike did not penetrate the turret and potentially glanced off. T-90 tanks are covered in what is called "reactive armor."

The armor serves an outer shell to the tank's hull that, when struck, counter-detonates to disrupt the flight of the incoming enemy missile. Reactive armor can be mounted on various other tanks and is not unique to the T-90. However, the T-90's reactive armor is likely a more advanced version of the types found on older Russian and Syrian tanks.

Watch the full video below:

SEE ALSO: US Naval engineer with access to US secrets indicted over Iranian passports and false identities

Join the conversation about this story »

The story of ‘the last great tank battle’ where the US destroyed 30 Iraqi tanks

$
0
0

m1 abrams desert stormThe men of the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment spearheaded one of the American columns that invaded Iraq on Feb. 23, 1991.

After three days of light fighting they stumbled into one of the largest Iraqi armored formations and annihilated it with cannons, TOW missiles and mortars in the Battle of 73 Easting, often called “the last great tank battle of the 20th century.”

Then-Capt. (now Lt. Gen.) H.R. McMaster, commander of Eagle Troop, 2nd Squadron, 2nd ACR, literally wrote the book on the battle and commanded one of the lead elements in the fight.

Helicopters buzzed over Eagle Troop as the ground invasion of Iraq began on Feb. 23. The mission of the 2nd ACR was simple in theory but would be challenging to achieve. They were to cut off Iraqi retreat routes out of Kuwait and destroy the large armored formations thought to be hiding in the flat, featureless desert.

The empty desert could be challenging to navigate since there were no features to use for direction. Heavy rains and windstorms limited visibility as the tanks and other vehicles felt their way through the desert.

Fox troop made contact first, destroying a few enemy tanks. Over the next couple of days, 2nd Squadron tanks and vehicles would encounter enemy observation and scout vehicles and destroy them with missiles and cannons, but they couldn’t find the Iraqi Republican Guard divisions they knew were dug somewhere into the desert.

Iraqi_T 72_tanks

In the afternoon of Feb. 26, 1991, McMaster was pushing his troop through a sandstorm when he crested a rise and there, directly in front of him, was an entire division of Iraqi tanks with elite crews. Finding himself already in range of the enemy, he immediately gave the order to fire.

The enemy had parked themselves away from the slight rise so that they would be hidden and so incoming American tanks would be forced to drive down the hill towards them. This exposed the relatively weak top armor of the tank to the Iraqi guns.

gulf war army tanks usa 3rd armored saudi arabia

But the Iraqis had lost most of their scout vehicles and so were just as surprised as the US commanders when the two armored forces clashed, leaving them unable to capitalize on their position.

McMaster’s opening salvo set the tone for the battle. His first shot was a HEAT round that destroyed a tank cowering behind a berm. His second shot, a depleted uranium sabot shell, shot through an Iraqi tank that was swiveling to fire on him. As his crew targeted a third enemy, the driver realized they were driving through a minefield and began taking evasive action.

iraqi tank desert storm gulf war

Enemy rounds began falling around the lead tank as the two tank platoons in Eagle Troop got on line to join the fight. Nine American tanks were now bearing down on the Iraqi positions, destroying enemy T-72s and armored vehicles. As McMaster described it in his first summary of the battle:

The few seconds of surprise was all we had needed. Enemy tanks and BMP’s (Soviet-made armored personnel carriers) erupted in innumerable fire balls. The Troop was cutting a five kilometer wide swath of destruction through the enemy’s defense.

The Bradley fighting vehicles joined the tanks, firing TOW missiles at the enemy armor and using their guns to cut down Iraqi infantry. Mortar and artillery support opened up, raining fire onto the remaining Iraqi positions.

The American forces cut down 30 tanks, 14 armored vehicles, and hundreds of infantrymen before reaching their limit of advance, the line they were originally told to halt at. But McMaster ordered the troop to continue attacking, fearful that the Iraqis would be able to regroup and wage a strong counterattack.

us army gulf war tank

At 23 minutes since first contact, McMaster declared it safe to halt his troop’s advance. The single armored troop had crippled the Iraqi flank with zero casualties. One American tank from the 2nd Squadron headquarters had received light damage from a mine.

Near the Eagle Troop position, Ghost, Killer, and Iron troops were mixing it up other Iraqi units and trying to catch up to Eagle. The enemy made a few half-hearted attempts at counter-attacking the US tanks, but they were quickly rebuffed.

That night, the US called on the Iraqi’s to surrender and it was answered by droves of troops. About 250 survivors surrendered to Eagle Troop.

Up and down the US lines, the story was similar to that of Eagle Troop. The Iraqis suffered nearly 1,000 casualties, 85 tanks destroyed, 40 armored vehicles destroyed, 30 wheeled-vehicles lost, and two artillery batteries annihilated. The US suffered 12 men killed, 57 men wounded, and 32 vehicles destroyed or damaged.

SEE ALSO: 17 reasons why the M1 Abrams tank is still king of the battlefield

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Ukrainian soldiers turned a tank cannon into the ultimate selfie stick

US Air Force vet to face trial for Islamic State support

$
0
0

ISIS islamic state militants

A US Air Force veteran betrayed his country and tried to become a fighter for the militant group Islamic State, federal prosecutors told a New York jury on Monday at the start of his criminal trial.

Tairod Nathan Webster Pugh traveled to Turkey in an effort to join Islamic State after he "immersed himself" in the group's violent propaganda, watching videos of beheadings and expressing approval on Facebook, Assistant US Attorney Mark Bini said in Brooklyn federal court.

But Pugh's defense lawyer, Eric Creizman, said Pugh's only crime was to voice support for Islamic State and that there was no evidence he planned to cross into Islamic State-controlled territory in Syria from Turkey.

"In this country, you don't punish a person for his thoughts," he said.

The case appears to be only the second Islamic State-related prosecution to reach trial, out of more than 75 brought by the US Department of Justice since 2014.

Earlier this month, Abdul Malik Abdul Kareem, who is accused of plotting with others to attack a Prophet Mohammed cartoon contest in Texas, went on trial in Phoenix. Two of his alleged associates were killed in a shootout with police at the event.

Pugh, 48, was detained by Turkish authorities in Istanbul in January 2015 after he returned from a year-long stint living in Egypt.

ISIS twitter pc

US investigators say they found a letter to Pugh's Egyptian wife on his computer declaring he would "defend the Islamic States" and saying he had two options: "Victory or Martyr."

They also discovered approximately 180 jihadist videos on his laptop, including one that showed Islamic State militants executing prisoners, according to prosecutors. Pugh destroyed four portable data drives upon being detained.

bin ladenPugh served as an avionics specialist in the Air Force from 1986 to 1990. In 2001, while Pugh was working as a mechanic for American Airlines, a co-worker tipped off the FBI that Pugh had expressed support for Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda, according to court documents.

Pugh later worked as an Army contractor in Iraq from 2009 to 2010, prosecutors said.

US District Judge Nicholas Garaufis has taken the rare step of agreeing to seal the courtroom during the testimony of an undercover FBI employee in order to protect his identity. An audio feed will be broadcast for the public in a separate courtroom, Garaufis said in a court order.

The trial is expected to last two weeks.

SEE ALSO: Watch the US-led coalition's precision airstrikes shred ISIS positions in Syria

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Former Defense Secretary calls out Trump for 'over-the-top’ ISIS plan


This Navy SEAL came out of the shadows just long enough to accept the Medal of Honor

$
0
0

Byers medal of honor

Senior Chief Special Warfare Operator (SEAL) Edward Byers Jr. has never sought the limelight in the more than 17 years that he has been in the Navy, but on Monday the eyes of the nation were on him as he received the Medal of Honor from President Barack Obama in a ceremony at the White House.

Byers was part of a SEAL Team Six rescue team sent to rescue Dilip Joseph, an American doctor and aid worker who had been taken hostage by the Taliban.

During the mission, Byers showed extreme courage and warfighting prowess by continuing into a room and shielding the doctor while taking out two insurgents after the SEAL in front of him, Petty Officer 1st Class Nicolas D. Checque, was hit by fire in the doorway.

The justification for the Medal of Honor was based largely on Joseph's testimony as captured in his book "Kidnapped by the Taliban: A Story of Terror, Hope and Rescue by SEAL Team 6," which was published in 2014. Joseph wrote in the book that he was sure his Taliban captors were going to kill him before the SEALs showed up.

The ceremony at the White House was attended by many members of the special operations community as well as other Medal of Honor recipients. Byers' family was also present in force. During his remarks, Obama noted that in addition to the SEAL's immediate family almost 50 members of his extended family were in attendance.

navy seal medal of honor Ed Byers

Obama also joked that Byers' mother's first question when she heard her son was receiving the Medal of Honor was, "Can I go to the ceremony?" Focusing on her in the audience the East Room, the president smiled and said, "Yes, mom, you can go."

Byers has deployed 11 times since 9/11. His previous awards include the Bronze Star and two Purple Hearts. He is the 11th living recipient of the Medal of Honor since 9/11.

SEAL Team Six, officially known as Devgru, which is short for Development Group, is a very secretive part of the special operations community used for the Pentagon's most sensitive missions. Devgru came to the public's attention in 2011 during Operation Geronimo, the mission to take out Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan.

SEE ALSO: 21 stunning photos prove the US Navy and US Marine Corps have the best diving boards and swimming pools

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: IAN BREMMER: Ukraine's government will fall apart 'by the end of this year'

The Syrian army may have already violated a fragile ceasefire with a land grab east of the capital

$
0
0

A boy looks on while residents inspect a damaged building in the rebel held besieged city of Douma, a suburb of Damascus, Syria February 27, 2016. REUTERS/Bassam Khabieh

Syrian armed forces took territory east of Damascus on Monday, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said, on the third day of a fragile international attempt to halt nearly five years of fighting.

A Syrian rebel spokesman said this was a violation of the truce deal in place.

The Observatory said that Syrian government forces took control of a strategically important piece of land between two neighborhoods in the eastern Ghouta suburb of Damascus.

The capture of the land between Beit Nayim and Harasta al-Qantara came after Syrian and allied forces fought Islamist factions and the al Qaeda-linked Nusra Front for around 24 hours, the Observatory said.

A fragile truce came into force in Syria early on Saturday, but the main opposition group has said that the deal could collapse because of continuing attacks by government forces.

Abu Ghiath al-Shami, spokesman for the Alwiyat Seif al-Sham group, part of a rebel alliance in the south, said government forces had been trying to storm the area in eastern Ghouta since the first day of the truce.

"This is a clear violation of the ceasefire," Shami said.

The cessation of hostilities, drawn up by Washington and Moscow, is a less formal arrangement than a ceasefire and is meant to allow peace talks to resume and aid to reach besieged communities.

The agreement does not include jihadist groups, such as Islamic State and the Nusra Front, and Russia --which is supporting Syrian forces with air attacks -- has made clear it intends to keep bombing them.

russianairstrikessyria

Eastern Ghouta is regularly targeted by the Syrian army and its allies. It is a stronghold of the Jaish al-Islam (Islam Army) rebel group, which is an influential member of the main opposition alliance, the High Negotiations Committee, and has been used as a launch pad for rocket and mortar attacks on Damascus.

SEE ALSO: Watch the US-led coalition's precision airstrikes shred ISIS positions in Syria

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Ashton Kutcher just made a surprise appearance on Ian Bremmer's weekly digital video series

Watch the US-led coalition's precision airstrikes shred ISIS positions in Syria

$
0
0

operation inherent resolve. al hasakah

On February 27 at 5 p.m. Damascus time, a US- and Russia-brokered cease-fire took effect in Syria between government forces and the opposition.

But the US-led coalition's efforts against ISIS — aka ISIL, Daesh, and the Islamic State — and Al Qaeda targets in Syria and Iraq will carry on undaunted. This is evident by recent videos released from the Combined Joint Task Force's Operation Inherent Resolve.

"I want to make totally clear that there will be absolutely no cease-fire with respect to ISIL," US President Barack Obama said in a statement. "We remain relentless in going after them."

Obama's statement came after a very busy week of bombing through Operation Inherent Resolve, which released videos of airstrikes destroying ISIS infrastructure, fighting positions, and oil wellheads. These videos show just a few of the 175 strikes OIR carried out between February 20 and 26.

These videos were taken before the cease-fire, but they will continue uninterrupted until top leadership determines that OIR's mission of degrading and destroying ISIS has been achieved.

Here a coalition airstrike obliterates a Daesh fighting position near Al Hasakah, Syria, on February 20:

Here we see another ISIS fighting position in Al Hasakah destroyed in a precision daytime airstrike on February 21:

Here, a range of ISIS bridges and culverts are razed near Dayr Az Zawr, Syria, on February 21 and 22:

Here we see a coalition airstrike annihilate an ISIS-controlled oil wellhead near Dayr Az Zawr:

SEE ALSO: The UN plans to get direly needed aid to 154,000 besieged Syrians in the next 5 days

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: ISIS is afraid of girls — here's why

Turkish artillery opened fire on ISIS in Syria

$
0
0

ISIS Turkey SyriaANKARA (Reuters) - Turkish artillery hit as many as 10 Islamic State targets inside Syria on Sunday, a military official said on Monday.

Up to 50 rounds were fired between 2 and 3 p.m. (1200-1300 GMT), the official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity. The Turkish broadcaster NTV said the targets were to the north of Aleppo.

Militants from the Islamist group had launched an assault on Sunday on the Kurdish-controlled town of Tal Abyad on Syria's border with Turkey.

Warplanes belonging to an international U.S.-led coalition responded with 10 air strikes to try to repel them, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported. It said at least 45 Islamic State militants and 20 Kurdish militia fighters had been killed.

While a U.S.- and Russian-sponsored "cessation of hostilities" came into effect in Syria over the weekend, the Syrian government, Russia and the U.S.-led coalition reserve the right to continue attacks against Islamic State or the al Qaeda affiliate the Nusra Front.

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said on Monday that the ceasefire covered only one third of Syria, but that he hoped it would be expanded to the whole country.

The countries sponsoring the Syria peace process met in Geneva on Monday amid complaints that the cessation of hostilities was unraveling, with France demanding information about reports of attacks on rebel positions.

(Reporting by Tulay Karadeniz and Ece Toksabay; Writing by Humeyra Pamuk and David Dolan; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

SEE ALSO: The US is urging Americans to leave Iraq before Mosul dam collapses

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Ashton Kutcher just made a surprise appearance on Ian Bremmer's weekly digital video series

China warns South Korea that deploying THAAD missile system would trigger a Cold War-like arms race

$
0
0

thaad missile lockheed

A Chinese ambassador has warned South Korea that the deployment of a US anti-missile system against North Korea would destroy the flourishing ties between the two countries. 

Chinese Ambassador Qiu Guohong warned Kim Chong-in, the chairman of South Korea's main opposition party, that the basing of the US-made THAAD missile system in South Korea would irreparably damage relations between the countries, The Chosunilbo reports

"Much effort has been made to develop bilateral ties to today's level, but these efforts could be destroyed in an instant with a single problem," Qiu warned Kim on Tuesday.

Qiu also warned Kim, during their 45 minute meeting, that the deployment of the US missile system would lead to an arms race in East Asia that would ultimately be to the detriment of all nations involved. 

The THAAD deployment, Qiu said, "would break the strategic balance in the region and create a vicious cycle of Cold War-style confrontations and an arms race, which could escalate tensions."

The US and South Korea have reportedly worked out a deal in which Washington will provide Seoul with the ant-missile system. The THAAD is the most advanced missile system on the planet, and is able to intercept missiles with a 100% success rate. 

The deployment of the THAAD system would be aimed at North Korea in order to provide protection for South Korea, Japan, and US assets from potential North Korean ballistic missiles. However, China opposes the placement of the missiles in South Korea as it believes that the anti-missile system would also be used against Chinese and Russian interests. 

"I do not deny the fact that THAAD would play a role in protecting [South] Korea, but it will inevitably target China and Russia," Qiu said on Tuesday.

Hypothetically, the THAAD system could indeed be used against Chinese missiles in South Korea. However, the deployment of the weapon system will be angled in such a way as to protect Seoul from North Korea without targeting China at all. 

The following graphic shows a likely placement of the THAAD system in South Korea: 

thaad china

SEE ALSO: 3 maps that outline North Korea's military might

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Meet THAAD: America’s answer to North Korean threats

Viewing all 10474 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>